Skip to content

Yes.

04/22/2010

Does the WH press corps have a golf double standard?

Advertisements

Trend?

04/22/2010

Democratic Representative Babette Josephs has called out her Democrat opponent Gregg Kravitz as faking bisexuality. Allahpundit asks “Are we nearing the point where bisexuals need their own closet?”

Another one under the bus

04/22/2010

Old news. But Goldman was Obama’s #2 donor.

“This is the Gay World Series, not the Bisexual World Series” or something

04/22/2010

I’ve long since noted that the LGBT community is more about the LG than the BT. In fact, many bisexual people will agree that some members of the gay community are quick to write off bisexuals as “half-breeders,” with breeders referring to straight people. But, since the LGBT is considered to be left-wing their intolerance is okay. Let’s not have an honest discussion about the racism in the gay community or the prejudice against straight people or that bisexuals apparently aren’t gay enough.

Breitbart’s Big Education can’t come soon enough

04/18/2010

Since I’m a college student and battle liberal professors everyday, I’m going to post these two videos from Liberal Education that feature liberal professors caught on tape. 

I’d like to touch on the second video in which a professor talks about the “American Dream.”  She says that there is a myth perpetuated that America is a “classless society” and that people cannot go from poor to rich. This is the typical liberal mantra. I have heard it in anthropology and sociology in which professors will ask students if the American Dream really is reality. Often, professors will say that not everybody can become rich, which is apparently evidence that the American Dream is false, though they ignore that basic economics will tell you that not everybody can be rich due to scarcity of resources. In fact, scarcity of resources is essential to why socialism and communism have never worked, in fact, these ideologies have made people equally poor. In fact, this view that America is a class society is perpetuated in films shown to students and is called conflict theory in sociology and is undeniably Marxist in its logic.

In fact, here is a sociology professor’s Powerpoint slides on the social class and the American Dream:

Here, the teacher shows “distribution of wealth of Americans.” Obviously, since the wealthiest own the most there should be redistribution of wealth.


Here we see that health care is a “resource necessary for material well-being.”

Paraphrasing Andy Levy: If healthcare is a right, then how can the government deny anyone any care they want or need? Also, I’d like to add, if healthcare is a right then why is Obama’s health plan not really kicking in until 4 years?


Here, the teacher knocks the functionalist perspective in sociology (because clearly the Marxist conflict theory is where it’s at), and features a cartoon by liberal and Howard Zinn supporter Kirk Anderson.


In the next slide, the teacher includes a video of “The Way We Live: Ups and Downs of Social Stratification.” The clip is part of a series that is a “comprehensive introduction to Sociology.” 

“Ups and Downs of Social Stratification,” which is part nine, is described as:

9. Ups and Downs: Social Stratification
Since the 1950s when opportunity reached its peak, the gap between the “haves and have nots” has grown. This lesson looks at social stratification and the dimensions of social inequality that exist in the United States. Factors that contribute to stratification are discussed, including race, gender, education, income level, and changes in the workplace. 

Clearly. Not. Biased. At. All. Also, viewers of Michael Moore’s Capitalism: A Love Story will realize that the description is very similar to Moore’s narrative in said documentary.

And here is the preview slide to the showing of Michael Moore’s Capitalism: A Love Story

The full Powerpoint can be found here.

Just for fun here’s two professors debating

And here is a stoned professor

Liberal Educators Talking Points

04/18/2010

Richard A. Middleton pathetically tried to dismiss claims of bias by saying that Barbara Geerdes was merely trying “to spark discussion among her students about political philosophies and bias…” I criticized this in my post as simply Middleton covering Geerdes’ biased ass.

That defense was used before in Denver where a liberal English professor had his students write a critical piece on Sarah Palin.

Here’s the TV report:

The spokeswoman in the YouTube video had this to say:

What the faculty’s responsibility is is to provide an opportunity for critical thinking and also civic engagement, so bringing something of relevancy into the classroom was the faculty member’s goal. Should he have broadened it and included all of the political figures? Yes

Again, as the spokeswoman touches on, how is a one-sided essay going to promote civic engagement and critical thinking? True, conservative students would be forced to be critical of Palin, but liberal students would bask in their bashing of Palin, which doesn’t challenge their own views at all. If the teacher truly wanted a discussion he would have students write about any politician or have his students write two essays each of which include a hot topic politician from each side. 

The teacher had other charges against him with students saying he cussed out Republicans and said one of his favorite activities was Bush bashing. Sounds like a talking point to cover for professors who lack critical thinking and objectivity skills.

‘Bout time we embrace it

04/18/2010

Andrew Breitbart posted this gem a few days ago:

If we embrace the teabagger moniker, it will be interesting to see how the left will react.